Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia

Referral

Subject: Urgent Referral for Evaluation of a Pediatric Patient with Severe Thrombocytopenia


Dear Colleague,

I am writing to refer a 2-year-old male patient for your evaluation and management concerning recent haematological abnormalities. The patient has presented with gum bleeding and a diffuse petechial rash across his body, alongside a critically low platelet count.

Patient Background and Clinical Presentation:

  • Known Medical History: The child has a diagnosis of congenital ichthyosis, which has been managed as per standard dermatological guidelines.
  • Current Symptoms:
    • Gum Bleeding: Recent onset, noted particularly during brushing.
    • Rash: Widespread petechial rash observed over the body.
  • Laboratory Findings:
    • Platelet Count: 5,000/µL (severely reduced)
    • Other Complete Blood Count (CBC) Parameters: Within normal limits, including haemoglobin and white blood cells.

Physical Examination Findings:

  • There is no hepatosplenomegaly, no lymphadenopathy and review of other systems is unremarkable, with no additional significant findings.

Given the severity of the thrombocytopenia and the associated bleeding and rash, a thorough evaluation is essential to determine the underlying cause and appropriate management strategy. The presence of congenital ichthyosis may also be relevant to his overall dermatological health, although it is not directly related to his current haematological symptoms.

The family is highly concerned about his recent symptoms and is keen on understanding the potential causes and treatment options. They have consented to further diagnostic testing and interventions that you may deem necessary.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this referral. We look forward to your expertise in managing and clarifying this complex pediatric case. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further details or specific information prior to your evaluation of the patient.

Reply

Dear Colleague,

Thank you for your referral of the full-term male infant, who presented under critical conditions requiring immediate medical intervention post-delivery. Following the initial stabilization phase, we have further assessed his current condition and have significant findings and recommendations to share.

Clinical Background and Immediate Postnatal History:

  • Delivery: The infant was delivered via emergency caesarean section due to foetal bradycardia.
  • Postnatal Care: Required intubation and mechanical ventilation.
  • Infections: Treated for MRSE (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Epidermidis) sepsis.
  • Dermatological Diagnosis: Initially identified as a Collodion baby, a condition later confirmed through a skin biopsy.

Family Medical History: The child’s parents are first cousins, which is significant given the family history of repeated miscarriages (10 occurrences) and the early demise of three siblings due to a similar genetic skin disorder and severe thrombocytopenia.

Initial Physical Examination:

  • The neonate was alert and conscious, with no signs of pallor or jaundice.
  • Observations: Slightly blue sclera, bilateral ectropion of the eyelids, and generalized dry skin covered with scaly crusted lesions predominantly on the hands, feet, and back. Notable erosion and abnormal contractures of the fingers and toes were observed.
  • Systemic Review: No other remarkable findings.

Recommended Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions:

  • Laboratory Tests: Urgent peripheral blood smear and coagulation profile, along with virology screening.
  • Treatment recommendation: IVIG to be given at 1gm/kg/day for 2 days.

Initial Impression:

Immune thrombocytopenia is initially considered.

Investigation Results and Follow-up:

Initial lab work for the patient that included peripheral blood smear and coagulation profile were normal.

The child didn’t respond the 2 doses of IVIG and instead remained with low platelets count. Methylprednisolone was considered; however, a bone marrow aspirate was performed prior to its initiation.

Bone Marrow Findings:

  • Cellularity: Adequate, with slightly reduced erythropoiesis.
  • Granulocytes: Normal in shape and distribution.
  • Megakaryocytes: Markedly reduced in number, with only one immature atypical megakaryocyte noted, leading to a strong suspicion of Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia.

Recommendations:

These findings suggest a complex clinical picture with a possible genetic link, considering the significant family history and the clinical presentation that aligns with Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia. This condition will necessitate ongoing, specialized management and genetic counselling for the family to address the underlying genetic components and plan for long-term care.

We will continue to monitor his condition closely and adjust treatment protocols as necessary based on his response and evolving clinical indicators.

Discussion

Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is a rare, congenital disorder evident in infancy, characterized predominantly by isolated thrombocytopenia and megakaryocytopenia without associated physical anomalies. The disorder stems from mutations in the c-MPL gene, which encodes the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor, essential for megakaryocytopoiesis—the process that governs the development of megakaryocytes, the bone marrow cells responsible for platelet production. Children with CAMT often face a nearly inevitable progression to bone marrow failure, which impacts all three hematopoietic cell lines over time.

This condition is further classified into two types based on the nature of the mutation:

  1. Type 1 CAMT (CAMT-1): This type results from mutations like stop codons or frameshifts that remove the intracellular domain of the MPL receptor, disrupting its function entirely. Such children present with severe thrombocytopenia at birth, are at an increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage, and typically advance to bone marrow failure by around 33 months of age.
  2. Type 2 CAMT (CAMT-2): This form is caused by splicing defects or amino acid substitutions that affect the receptor’s glycosylation, diminishing its ability to interact with thrombopoietin. While the receptor’s function is reduced, not entirely lost, children with CAMT-2 experience milder, often transient, thrombocytopenia during their first year. Bone marrow failure occurs more slowly, generally between ages three and six.

Genetic Variability and CAMT

Not all cases of CAMT can be attributed directly to mutations in the MPL gene. Other genetic anomalies, such as those in the HOXA11 and MECOM genes, which regulate megakaryocyte differentiation, or the RBM8A gene, which leads to thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome, also contribute to the disease. Additional proposed causes include an X-linked form of CAMT and specific anti-HLA A2 antibodies.

Pathophysiology of CAMT

The development of megakaryocytes starts from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow, progressing through several stages of differentiation reliant on thrombopoietin (THPO). THPO is vital for increasing the number, size, and ploidy of megakaryocytes. Its receptor, MPL, is crucial for these cells to progress from progenitors to mature megakaryocytes and eventually produce platelets.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

CAMT typically manifests with significant thrombocytopenia early in life, potentially as early as the first day or month. Initial symptoms can include purpura, intracranial bleeds, and other haemorrhagic complications. The diagnosis is generally confirmed via bone marrow biopsy showing reduced or absent megakaryocytes and genetic testing for mutations in the MPL gene.

Bone marrow core biopsy of a patient with acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia with CD61 immuno-histochemical staining showing decreased number of megakaryocytes (in brown)

A family history of thrombocytopenia may be present. No characteristic congenital phenotypic abnormalities are associated with CAMT. Some studies have noted neurological defects like strabismus, cerebellar agenesis, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum and brainstem, facial malformations, and cortical dysplasia. The mechanism behind the neurological findings is unclear. One possibility is that the absence or deficiency of MPL in the brain, as seen in CAMT, can lead to developmental delay. The other hypothesis considers the long-term intracranial neurological sequelae.

Treatment Considerations for Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia (CAMT)

  1. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): HSCT remains the sole curative treatment for CAMT, particularly for patients with mutations in the c-Mpl gene, which is most common. Optimal outcomes require early transplantation, ideally before the onset of pancytopenia, to minimize risks such as multiple transfusions, alloimmunization, and infections. HLA typing is recommended at diagnosis to facilitate donor selection. The average age for HSCT in CAMT patients is 38 months, with a range from 7 to 89 months. Conditioning regimens typically include busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation, aiming for a fully myeloablative effect with survival rates around 80%. However, these regimens are associated with significant risks, including pulmonary, mucosal, and hepatic toxicity, and potential long-term infertility. Discussions about fertility preservation are essential. Recent advancements have included the use of less toxic, non-myeloablative protocols that preserve fertility and reduce overall toxicity, improving patient outcomes.
  2. Supportive Treatment: Supportive care is critical for managing CAMT and includes irradiated, leukocyte-reduced platelet transfusions and the use of antifibrinolytics, such as tranexamic acid. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin should be avoided to reduce bleeding risks. In cases of pancytopenia, treatment may require packed red blood cells and antibiotics to manage or prevent infections.
  3. Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists: For patients with thrombopoietin (THPO) mutations, treatment options include romiplostim, a THPO peptide mimetic, and eltrombopag, a small molecule MPL receptor agonist that can induce necessary conformational changes in the receptor. These treatments, however, do not benefit patients with c-Mpl gene mutations, as their issue lies with the receptor itself rather than THPO production.
  4. Experimental Therapies: The exploration of new treatments for CAMT includes gene therapy using lentiviral vectors to repair the c-Mpl gene, although this method raises concerns about potential leukemogenicity effects. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing techniques have also been employed to directly correct the genetic defects. Additionally, experimental pharmacological agents such as LGD-4665, minibodies, and diabodies are under investigation. These agents aim to stimulate defective MPL receptors to enhance megakaryocyte proliferation and function. These therapies remain experimental and are used primarily within clinical trial settings or under special access programs.

Overall, the management of CAMT requires a comprehensive approach that includes both definitive therapies like HSCT and supportive measures to manage symptoms and complications, alongside ongoing research into innovative treatment modalities.

Check the correct answers.

Question-1:

Correct Answer: A) MPL gene mutation resulting in a non-functional thrombopoietin (THPO) receptor due to a stop codon or frameshift mutation
Explanation:
Type 1 CAMT is characterized by mutations that lead to a non-functional THPO receptor, specifically through stop codons or frameshift mutations in the MPL gene. These mutations result in severe thrombocytopenia at birth and early progression to bone marrow failure.

Question-2:

Correct Answer: C) Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
Explanation:
Allogeneic HSCT is the only curative treatment available for CAMT, particularly for those with severe forms and identified MPL mutations. This procedure typically requires a donor who is HLA-compatible to minimize the risks of graft-versus-host disease and ensure the best possible outcomes.

References

  • Tirthani E, Said MS, De Jesus O. Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia. [Updated 2023 Aug 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568795/
  • Rovira M, Feliu E, Florensa L. Acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with immunoglobulin deficiency. Acta Haematol 1991; 85:34-36.  
  • Ihara K, Ishii E, Eguchi M, Takada H, Suminoe A, Good RA, et al. Identification of mutations in the cmpl gene in congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:3132-6.
  • Germeshausen M, Ballmaier M, Welte K. MPL mutations in 23 patients suffering from congenital a megakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: the type of mutation predicts the course of the disease. Hum Mutat 2006; 27:296.
  • Henter J-I, Winiarski J, Ljungman P et al. Bone marrow transplantation in two children with amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 799-801.
  • MacMillan ML, Davies SM, Wagner JE, Ramsay NK. Engraftment of unrelated donor stem cells in children with familial amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 735-737.

Discover more from Cancer Networks

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Cancer Networks

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Cancer Networks

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading